Diversity Destroyed Our Cities

America in modern times, the last century at least, has been a nation of contrasts that fall into the urban/rural divide, from music to elections. The suburbs have always seemed to be an afterthought that no one is really passionate about. America is marked by our great cities like New York, Chicago and L.A. interspersed with vast rural areas where so much American nostalgia is found in farms and ranches, cowboys and farmers, mountains and plains. But no matter how rural an area, it is usually the case that the denizens of that area find some affinity with the nearest big city, especially their sports teams. People on the western slope of Colorado likely root for the Broncos and people in the upper peninsula of Michigan cheer on the Red Wings.

Unfortunately these days our cities are largely places that the White people that built them only visit for entertainment and work. Diversity has killed our once great cities.

In a "controversy" I missed last November, Jamie Johnson who was (briefly) formerly the head of the Homeland Security department's Center for Faith-Based & Neighborhood Partnership was fired for this example of wrongthink in an old interview before he was part of DHS.

"I think one of the reasons why is because Jewish people from their coming to America in great waves in the early part of the 1800's immediately rolled up their sleeves and began to work so hard and applied themselves to education and other means of improvement and other means of climbing the, I hate this phrase, but the social ladder if you will," Johnson said. "And they have done exceptionally well for themselves. For only representing about 1.4% of America's population, they make up 12% of America's millionaires. Why? Because they work.

"And it's an indictment of America's black community that has turned America's major cities into slums because of laziness, drug use and sexual promiscuity."

Johnson then agreed with another guest who said the success of Jewish-Americans "removes the argument of victimization from the black community."

In the appearance, Johnson also argued that the left in America did not want black Republicans because "diversity is simply a cloak to hide a far-left Marxist globalist ideology that seems to undercut and undermine every principle on which this nation was built."

What is most notable about what he said is how completely accurate it is. Blacks, and to an extent mestizo immigrants, have turned our cities into dystopian wastelands. Not every city and not in every part of course. But in places like Chicago, Detroit, New Orleans and Baltmore there are entire neighborhoods you really shouldn't go. While they have nice areas heavily patrolled with police in their business districts and near sports arenas, the rest of the cities are incredibly violent and even where the violence is not constant there is a palpable malaise. There are some decent cities but they tend to not have a lot of black people (like liberal utopias Portland with only 6.3% blacks and Seattle, 7.9%. Liberals love colored folk, they just don't want them living near them).

Here are just a few examples I picked somewhat at random.

In Cleveland, 24 year old black man Jermaine Hines, Jr. punched a 51 year old White woman and accused her of being in the KKK for no reason other than she is White. In a rare move, the police are calling this a hate crime, probably because it was so egregious, and charging him with "ethnic intimidation".

At the Wolfchase Galleria in Memphis, Marquice Lester was arrested for a brawl that turned into a gun battle where three people were wounded. As you can guess from the name, Mr. Lester is the ubiquitous young black man. Two juveniles were also arrested with guns, you can probably bet the farm on their race as well, as were a number of other juveniles, presumably unsupervised in any way, arrested for fighting and various disorderly conduct. Over the last three years there have been multiple other large scale distrubances at this mall, all involving unsupervised "youth".

Detroit. Oh Detroit. They are celebrating "only" 267 murders in 2017.

Indianapolis is setting a new record of 150 (or more) murders, breaking the previous record set in 2016 of 149. Indianapolis!

In Minneapolis, aka Mogadishu Northwest, a White woman is apparently randomly stabbed 14 times by a Somali and of course the media pretends it didn't happen. The article also lists other examples of how Somali invaders immigrants have enriched the culture around Minneapolis. Of note is the "bombing" of the Dar al-Farooq Islamic Center where there still have been no arrests. As I pondered in a previous post, A "Bombing"? How Convenient, this incident happened at a rather suspicious time and came shortly after a different Somali, Mohamed Noor, killed a different White woman, Justine Damond. No one has been arrested and I suspect no one ever will but I bet the mosque will enjoy spending the money donated by many needlessly guilty White people, including a lot of deluded Christians who are indirectly supporting the propagation of an anti-Christian pagan religion.

This headline really captures the issue:

ONE-THIRD Of U.S. Homicide Spike Coming From 5 Chicago Neighborhoods

Everyone from the most rabid alt-right meme warrior to the pussy hat wearing intersectional gender fluid trans-racial activists knows without even reading the article the racial make-up of those 5 neighborhoods.

In a recent National Review article (notable for being not totally useless like most NRO content), from pro-police writer Heather MacDonald, Don’t Take the Wrong Lessons from NYC’s Murder Drop, she pointed to some staggering but completely expected statistics:

A black New Yorker is 50 times more likely to commit a shooting than a white New Yorker, according to perpetrator identifications provided to the police by witnesses to, and victims of, those shootings. Those victims are overwhelmingly minority themselves. When the racial balance of a neighborhood changes radically, given those crime disparities, its violent-crime rate will as well. (This racial crime disparity reflects the breakdown of the black family and the high percentage of black males — upwards of 80 percent in some neighborhoods — being raised by single mothers.)

The dirty secret of crime in America is that absent blacks and mestizos, the U.S. would have far less crime, need far fewer cops and spend untold millions less on prisons and medical care (according to the report, in 2016 4,300 people were shot in Chicago. Assuming most of them either had no insurance or were on government insurance and each case cost $10,000 in care, that works out to around $43 million in hospital care just in Chicago alone in one year). There are some serious Constitutional questions with practices like stop and frisk but then again the Constitution was written to govern a White, predictably more law-abiding population. As the relative murder rates and the comparable policing tactics of Chicago/Baltimore vs. New York demonstrate, we have a choice between pretending to live in a Libertarian utopia where people will obey the law if you just encourage them to read the Constitution versus where blacks and mestizos commit crimes at staggering rates and the only way to minimize the number of killings is to basically harass black and mestizo men until they go back to their apartments to smoke pot and play XBox for entertainment instead of shooting each other.

We are often told that diversity is our greatest strength and that diversity has made all of our lives so much better but the bitter pill we all must swallow sooner or later is that the opposite is true. The Negro has always been an albatross around the neck of the United States. Had we deported all of the freed slaves back to Africa following the Civil War, this country would be immeasurably stronger than it is now. When the Immigration And Nationality Act of 1965 was passed and we started to import diversity, coupled with the "War on poverty" and the rise of "Civil Rights" laws, at the same time that the overly coddled White majority started to lose their edge, this nation started on a path downward that has at best had a few moments where the descent was momentarily slowed (the elections of Reagan and Trump, etc.).

For now the urban centers of America are the most visible sign of our decline. As they rot from within, with small pockets of heavily policed safe zones for Whites to work and be entertained, they continue to push the productive class of people of all races further away. We are not very far away from the day when John Carpenter's dystopian vision from Escape From New York comes true and the once proud cities of America get walled off, not to keep invaders out but to keep the residents in.

2017 In (Blogging) Review

I posted 57 times here in 2017, and another 32 times at my old blog location. 89 posts in a year is less than twice a week and that just isn't getting it done. It isn't a lack of things to write about but it is a failure to set aside enough time and to simply have the discipline to make myself sit down and write, not to mention actually finishing posts I started that fizzled out.

I am still feeling my way out in this venue. Where do I come down on the Jewish Question, what is my stance on the right way to seize the narrative, what do I even call my stance? Perhaps in 2018 I can solidify some of these questions and have a more defined niche.

The posts I put out tend to be a little longer, so I am considering trying to post more often and in a shorter format. Some big topics I might break up. I know that if you post only occasionally it is hard to get an audience since they never know when you might put something up. I get a couple dozen hits on almost every post so at least a few people are reading, I hope I have something worthwhile to say so I'll just keep plugging along!

Happy Kwanzaa!

Yesterday marked the start of Kwanzaa! This made-up holiday is all about celebrating blackness/African heritage. The man who started Kwanzaa,  Ronald McKinley Everett or as he styles himself these days, Maulana Ndabezitha Karenga, had a very laudable reason for creating this holiday out of whole cloth:

He said his goal was to "give Blacks an alternative to the existing holiday and give Blacks an opportunity to celebrate themselves and their history, rather than simply imitate the practice of the dominant society."

I am all in favor of this. The more blacks separate themselves culturally from Whites, the easier it will be to separate them physically from us. Even though Karenga is a convicted felon for torturing naked women, which hasn't stopped him from being a professor and chairman of the "Africana studies" department at California State. Long Beach, I support his black nationalism. Let the blacks have their own holidays and culture and churches and other institutions and eventually let them have their own ethnostate where they can be free of White persecution and Whites can be free from having to pay for blacks and from violence at the hands of blacks.

Right now two of the main problems with distinct ethnostates for Whites and blacks is that a) blacks are entirely reliant on the largesse of Whites that fund and subsidize many aspects of everyday life for a huge percentage of blacks and b) blacks have some affinity for the United States. By encouraging them to embrace their differentness and to form and celebrate their own separate heritage we can begin to unwind their connection with the U.S.. As for the first part, the national debt and looming crisis over entitlements ought to get the job done as soon the government will either have to cut welfare spending or collapse entirely or both.

I won't be lighting candles or pouring out drink offerings or whatever it is you do for Kwanzaa but I wholeheartedly support the expansion of exclusively black rituals and institutions.

Trump Does The Bidding Of The (((Neocons))) and Goofy Dispensationalist Teachers

Today the long expected announcement came out that President Trump is moving forward with recognizing the city of Jerusalem as the capitol of Israel and announcing a move of our embassy from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem. As expected this has caused a great deal of anger among the already angry and easy to trigger Muslim world. I expect some fairly serious violence to erupt as a result. The Muslims are usually up for a good intifada and it has been awfully quiet for a while. Just as predictably, the leader of our "great ally" Israel, Benjamin Netanyahu, has been gushing all over social media, crowing about this decision and calling on other nations to follow suit and move their own embassies. That isn't really likely to happen and even the move by the U.S. embassy will be years down the road. You can also expect a lot of vandalism, terror attacks and low level violence to accompany every step of the building process of the new embassy. I am sure our great friends the Israelis will let the U.S. pay for the whole thing.

So with the wall unbuilt, Obamacare still sort of in place, immigration reform going nowhere even after the travesty in San Francisco, the tax bill still needing leadership to ensure it makes it to Trump's desk, a $20 trillion national debt and so many other issues that need Trump's attention and political capital, you might wonder why he would decide to take this step. On the surface the reason is that he promised to do so and unlike other candidates Trump seems to take his promises seriously. But the real reason boils down to two words.

Neocons and Dispensationalism

The neocons thing is easy to understand. Neoconservatism is a subset of American conservatism that has an outsized influence on the Republican party. It was perhaps at the apex when George W. Bush was President and neocons were the driving force behind the ill-fated Iraq invasion. It is a movement that is heavily slanted toward Israel thanks to having so many Jews as leading voices. Neocons are mostly influential in foreign policy and they favor a highly interventionist stance, especially when we are asked to go to war to "protect" our "allies" in Israel. Since they are led by the most militant of American Jews, it is natural that neocons would be pushing for this gesture to show for the millionth time that "We stand with Israel", although Israel never seems to stand with us in any meaningful sense. Our relationship seems to be America giving money and anything else Israel wants to the Jews and Israel in turn agrees to accept what we give them.

The other side of the coin is the relatively recent theological invention known as "dispensationalism". The teachings of dispensationalism are a little complex but this is a nice summary, note my emphasis underlined:

Dispensationalism is a theological system that teaches biblical history is best understood in light of a number of successive administrations of God's dealings with mankind, which it calls "dispensations." It maintains fundamental distinctions between God's plans for national Israel and for the New Testament Church, and emphasizes prophecy of the end-times and a pre-tribulation rapture of the church prior to Christ's Second Coming. Its beginnings are usually associated with the Plymouth Brethren movement in the UK and the teachings of John Nelson Darby.

The critical component for my purposes here is the idea that there is a distinct and separate plan for Israel and the church. While most Christian theology sees a shift with the advent of the New Testament where the nation of Israel under the Old Covenant fades into the background and the church is ascendant as God's final vehicle for His covenant people, dispensationalism sees the church as a "parenthetical" interruption to God's original and continual plan to work through the ethnic Jewish people. It can be said that dispensationalism gives preference to the Old Testament over the New Testament. This school of theology was popularized by the simply awful Left Behind book series by Tim LaHaye and Jerry Jenkins, some of the worst literature to ever hit a printing press.

So what? Why does some esoteric discussion of Christian eschatology have anything to do with U.S. foreign policy?

If there is a theological system that dominates the Christian church in America, it is without a doubt various models of dispensationalism. It infects most areas of evangelicalism and even some parts of the Reformed church, although most of the Reformed still hold to Covenant Theology or in much smaller numbers New Covenant Theology. The same people that are most influenced by dispensationalism are also some of the most political active in the Republican party, meaning that a lot of Christians who faithfully vote Republican also think that they have a solemn, religious obligation to support Israel no matter what and in whatever way the Jews say they should. Conservative politicians understand this and suck up to the Jewish Israeli lobby at every opportunity and woe to the Republican that is insufficiently obsequious toward Israel.

For a lot of evangelicals, supporting the unbelieving state of Israel is a high holy obligation on par with their own national allegiance and almost higher than their identification with the church. On days like today or anytime that Israel is in the news, you can be sure people will be (mis)quoting Genesis 12:3 and other Old Covenant passages that refer to Israel as a nation, passages that are obsolete just as the Old Covenant is obsolete and replaced by the New Covenant (Hebrews 8:13).

While it is my understanding that Christians are very limited in how they can operate in Israel (i.e. proselytizing Jews), there is apparently no limit to how much money Jews will take from gullible Christians. I know of many Christians that visit the "Holy Land" as if that is a significant pilgrimage or Christians that donate money to Jewish causes like financially supporting Jews moving to Israel. Why a Christian would financially support moving a lost Jewish person from a country where they can be proselytized to a country where it is next to impossible for them to be evangelized is mind boggling. Why would a Christian supposedly devoted to the spreading of the Gospel willfully make it harder for lost people to hear the Gospel? The only reason is that they have bought into dispensationalism and think that there is another path for Jews. This belief is false.

The Bible is quite clear. There are not two paths to justification, one for gentiles and one for Jews. There is one path, faith in Christ. To teach otherwise is to make yourself a false teacher and to preach "another Gospel", something that Paul condemns in the strongest language possible in the opening to his letter to the Galatians where he was ironically calling out people trying to infuse Judaism back into Christianity via the practice of circumcision.

Dispensationalism is a deception that is used to leech money from Christians that should be used for spreading the Gospel and supporting the needs of Christians, it is a false teaching that preaches a false Gospel to the Jews and it is used by the Jews to manipulate American foreign policy in ways that cost hundreds of billions of U.S. dollars, weakens our position in the world and has led to the death of thousands of American men and women.

Unfortunately as today shows, in spite of President Trump claiming to be all about "America First", the hold of the neocons and the Israel lobby on America is as strong as ever. People who understand the manipulative tactics of the Israel lobby, the deception of the neocons and the confusion of dispensational teachers have a duty to expose the lies of both Israel as an "ally" of America and of Israel as a covenant people on par with the church. These lies cause instability in an already unstable region, cost American money and lives and lead many people to hell that think they get a pass because of their parentage.

The South Africazation Of The United States

Alphonse de Neuville - The defence of Rorke's Drift 1879

South Africa and more specifically the plight on White farmers and other Whites in S.A. has been getting a great deal of attention in our circles of late. Rightly so. While many people are stuck in the "Lethal Weapon 2 / Nelson Mandela media creation" mindset toward White South Africans where all Whites are cartoonish villains with funny accents keeping the peaceful black South Africans in bondage, we have viewed the state sanctioned, or at least ignored, violence of the black majority toward the White minority with a great deal of alarm. The situation in South Africa and Rhodesia (aka Zimbabwe) is an example of what happens to Whites when blacks are in control (spoiler alert it is not good for the Whites) and serves as a sneak preview of what life might be like in the not-too-distant future in places like Europe and North America as plummeting White birth rates and mass immigration of blacks and browns from Africa, Asia and the Middle East in response to their explosive birthrates subsidized by well-meaning but unintentionally suicidal Whites in the West, leads to Whites becoming a minority in their own nations before the end of the century, if not much sooner. For more, check out this video from VertigoPolitix.



One aspect of this transformation of America and Europe from White ethnostates to multicultural utopias that is given less attention is the way in which the very people being replaced and undergoing self-genocide are also subsidizing their own destruction. It is a statistic that should come to mind easily for anyone who is not sold out on the politics of envy that a huge percentage of the income tax revenue in this country comes from a very small percentage of the people, i.e. those awful "1%'ers". In general the upper and upper-middle class subsidize the rest of the country, especially those who fall into the approximately 50% of tax-payers that pay no income tax, many of whom still get a "refund".

This is true in South Africa as well. Of special interest to me was this quote from Taki Magazine, The “Coffin Case” and the Joys of Hating White Afrikaners, and the statistic it contained:

All this in the context of some startling statistics. In a country of roughly 60 million people, less than 4 million pay tax, and almost 90 percent of them are white. The tax base is shrinking as whites take fright and leave and their children in large numbers follow because they are racially discriminated against in the job market.

That is really the more pressing issue. For now the wide scale violence among blacks takes places almost exclusively among blacks, blacks killing blacks, although the incidence of domestic violence and rape on the part of black men inflicted on White women is deeply troubling. Where we are headed as a nation is a situation like this, with an ever increasing minority base of net takers of social services (blacks and mestizos) and the opposing trend of an ever decreasing White tax based to pay for them as the numbers of productive White tax payers shrinks and more and more young Whites join minorities in the category of net takers from social services. Like South African Whites, we don't really have anywhere to go.

Of course one could also suggest that America in 2017 also strongly resembles ancient Rome before she fell or a more contemporary analogy could be drawn to Weimar Germany. Check out this quote from Identity Dixie's article The Sexual Decadence of Weimar Germany:

The Jews had managed, in the space of a mere fourteen years, to bring about a major “transvaluation of values” in Weimar Germany. The vices of the past were now its virtues. The only vice that remained was chastity.

It is hard to imagine anything more reviled in our contemporary American "culture" than chastity, self-control, moderation and modesty. Another important quote from this essay:

It is self-evident that there is no other way to get control of a society with strong moral values than to weaken those values. The formula is simple: destroy the belief system on which that society is founded, especially its religion and its traditional codes of honor and decency. Promote godlessness and a philosophy of despair. To put it in even plainer language: reduce men to beasts if you wish to control them.

Does that not almost perfectly describe America in 2017? Young men in despair turning inwardly and avoiding both work and normal relationships on the one hand or engaging in pure brutishness on the other. Endless deconstruction of the American creed and the rewriting of American history to inflate the roll of non-Whites (i.e. portraying Alexander Hamilton as a non-White in the play Hamilton, inflating the role of black women in the space program in Hidden Figures, etc.)

Any way you slice it, America is heading over a cliff. Over 20 trillion dollars in debt, another 1.5 trillion in student loan debt, credit card debt, not to mention unfunded liabilities from here to Timbuktu. Compound that with a rapidly shrinking productive tax-paying population (most Whites, virtually all Asians) and an increasing net negative tax and benefit liability class (most blacks and mestizos) and a nightmare scenario where America looks a lot like South Africa is in our future. The big difference is that America is much larger, already has hundreds of millions of guns and just happens to have a huge nuclear arsenal. The political cowardice of our least moral and productive citizens in the government makes a South African future look increasingly likely for the U.S.

Shocking News From Eastern Europe!

The Wall Street Journal reports that Central and Eastern European economic growth is exploding, which of course frightens the WSJ because of possible "overheating": Buoyant Central and Eastern Europe Revives Overheating Fears. While European growth overall is decent, around 2.3% to 2.5%, it is in the East and Center of Europe that things are really popping.

Nowhere has the turnaround been more impressive than in central and Eastern Europe, where third-quarter growth across the region was well ahead of the EU average and market expectations: the Polish and Czech economies grew by 5%, Latvia’s by 6.2%, Slovakia’s and Lithuania’s by 3.4%, Romania’s by a remarkable 8.6%.

Wow, I wonder what could be the difference? I am sure it has nothing to do with the lack of a combination of a lavish welfare state and mass absorption of untold hordes of migrants who are not employed, not assimilated in any meaningful sense and that have no interest in changing either. If Eastern Europe can start to reproduce actual Europeans via child birth, there is little to stop them from becoming independent economic powers in their own right and no longer dependent on hand-outs from the "enlightened" West. Of course this is the globalist Wall Street Journal so no good news would be complete without ominous warnings about the need for "new Europeans", note the portions in red.

The best response to skills shortages is active labor market policies that encourage more women and older people into the workforce, facilitate immigration, raise educational standards and improve health systems.

The old globalist stand-by, mass immigration even though current immigrants from Third World nations into Europe are barely employed (or employable) and more women in the work force. Perhaps I can offer an alternate suggestion. Instead of one more woman entering the workforce, what if that one woman got married, stayed home and had four children? Statistically that would be two more males who could then enter the workforce in 18 years. Do that for a couple of generations and the labor "shortage" solves itself. Not to mention that as the economy grows more strongly, labor remains tight and wages go up the 20 million people that have left the region over the last 25 years will come home. Again, why bring in unemployable and often lazy and violent immigrants when you can bring Poles that already speak Polish back to Poland?

The globalists will not be satisfied until they can replace the independent people of Europe with more easily manipulated and controlled migrants but the solution is already there. Have children and create the conditions to encourage expatriate Eastern Europeans to come home. Eastern Europe must avoid the trap of native population eradication via low child birth and mass immigration if it is to survive this century.

I've Never Met A White Supremacist And You Probably Haven't Either

There is probably no term more misused and wildly misapplied in our national discourse than "White supremacist". To hear it told, there are White supremacists (hereafter just WS) around every corner, under every bed and skulking around looking for a chance to lynch some black guy for no reason whatsoever. Really anything short of openly calling for the extermination of the White race and the utter cleansing of any trace of White civilization (except for the internet and everything else White people invented) is considered WS. Anyone and everyone is part of WS  from Richard Spencer and Ramzpaul to Black Pigeon Speaks and Stephen Bannon. It is a term so overused that it has become meaningless.

This video from Lana Lokteff does a good job deconstructing the WS myth.



The more accurate way of describing people like Spencer and most of the Alt-Right is some variation on White Nationalism. No one I know of wants to rule over blacks and mestizos. That is 18th and 19th century thinking. The White man's burden is a thing of the past. Mostly now we just want them to go somewhere else and leave us alone.

On the bright side WS is a term that is so overused that it has become meaningless and therefore loses it's sting entirely. If everyone is a WS then no one cares if you call them that and that actually opens a lot of doors. I think a lot of garden variety normie conservatives are looking more seriously into the alt-right, race realism, White nationalism, etc. because the danger of being called a WS has pretty much become a non-issue. Again, if you are going to be accused of WS anyway, you might as well give race realism an honest examination. Often the best recruitment tools we have are the overuse of name-calling by leftists/SJWs/globalists/race-baiters because sooner or later the name-calling hits a tipping point and stops being effective as a means of silencing us.

So if you think that White culture and White people have a worthwhile history and are deserving of perpetuation in any form, you are a White supremacist. Since you are going to get called that anyway, you might as well embrace it!

The People In Poland Get It

In celebration of the anniversary of Polish independence in 1918, some 60,000 Poles took to the streets to celebrate their national pride. They also seemed pretty Right wing, much to the horror of many self-loathing Whites in the West. 

The largely young crowd shot off roman candles and chanted “fatherland,” carrying banners that read “White Europe,” “Europe Will Be White,” and “Clean Blood.” Some of the marchers flew in from neighboring countries—Slovakia, Spain and Hungary—waving flags and symbols those countries used during their wartime collaboration with Nazi Germany.

“There are of course nationalists and fascists at this march,” said Mateusz, a 27-year-old wrapped in a Polish flag, “I’m fine with it. I’m just happy to be here.”

As I have said before, Poland largely seems to understand what the West does not, that Western culture is under assault and in danger of being eradicated. You cannot simply replace White European with blacks and browns from the Third World and still have Europe and losing Europe makes the entire world a worse place. This quote is gold:

The Radical Camp’s followers argue, on their social-media accounts and in their literature, that the influx of Syrian refugees into Europe is part of a conspiracy driven by Jewish financiers, who are working with Communists in the European Union to bring Muslims into Europe, and with them, Shariah law and homosexuality.

Well that pretty much sums it up. As this is from the globalist HQ of the Wall Street Journal that only sees people as interchangeable economic units and doesn't care who buys their stuff as long as someone is buying, the tone is of course borderline hysterical but other quotes make what should be common sense assertions:

“It’s like this inner need we have,” said Lukasz, a 24-year-old protester. “We want a Poland that will be for Polish people.”

Poland for Polish people is of course racist in a way that Israel for Jewish people or Kenya for Kenyans or India for Indians is not. 

Poland, Hungary, the Czech Republic and the other nations of the East give me hope for the White race and European culture. By rejecting mass immigration and by openly choosing their native faith of Catholicism over Islam, Poland is one of the leaders striking out a new path that rejects the multicultural future demanded by the E.U.. If they can just remember how to have babies again, Poland can become a powerhouse of Europe. A nation 25 years from now that replenished their population with White Poles is going to be in a much better place than a Germany or France that tries to replace White natives with sub-Saharan Africans and violent Muslims.

I hope it never comes but there may come a day when racially aware Whites in America, Canada and Western Europe will need to look to Eastern Europe and Russia for sanctuary.